The Invading Sea
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Multimedia
  • Public opinion
  • About
No Result
View All Result
The Invading Sea
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Multimedia
  • Public opinion
  • About
No Result
View All Result
The Invading Sea
No Result
View All Result

UF/IFAS researchers address issues facing indoor farms 

Indoors operations use far less land than conventional farms, but have high electricity use relative to traditional farming

by Brad Buck
May 3, 2024
in News
0

By Brad Buck, UF/IFAS Communications

Across the globe, people are increasingly turning to greenhouses and indoor vertical farms to grow commodities. The systems use far less land than conventional farms, thereby drastically reducing some environmental impacts, University of Florida researchers say. 

They also require less transportation to get the food to consumers because they tend to be in or near urban areas, and their food tends to be safer. 

Also known as controlled-environmental agriculture (CEA) – or “plant factories with artificial lighting” – they can help boost food production in urban and drought-prone regions. 

A Canadian greenhouse company only builds greenhouses on rooftops to maximize their land-use efficiency. (Courtesy UF/IFAS)
A Canadian greenhouse company only builds greenhouses on rooftops to maximize their land-use efficiency. (Courtesy UF/IFAS)

In Florida, indoor farms can be found in such places as Tampa, The Villages, Jacksonville and Miami, said Ziynet Boz, a UF/IFAS assistant professor of agricultural and biological engineering.  

On the flipside, indoor farms and greenhouses cost a lot of money to start and maintain. You need $50 to $150 per square foot to build a greenhouse. For a 10,000-square foot greenhouse, that’s $500,000 to $1.5 million, UF/IFAS researchers said. 

That doesn’t include electricity, which accounts for 20 to 30% of your operational costs.  

Boz led a newly published paper that examined research on the sustainability challenges faced by those growing crops and ornamental plants through CEA. 

As outlined in the paper, the main obstacles for these indoor operations are: 

  • High electricity use, relative to traditional farming. 
  • Geography-related tradeoffs after the indoor farm is built. For example, extreme temperatures impact the effectiveness of your climate control system and your cost. Rural areas also may be cheaper but may require more transportation. 
  • Unfavorable public perception of CEA in comparison to field production. Consumers perceive “plant factories” as unnatural systems, and they want transparency. 

“These issues are now being addressed by optimized lighting and sensor technology, decision-support tools to reduce electricity use and communications tactics to educate people about the benefits of CEA,” Boz said. “By addressing challenges, farmers and researchers can improve the sustainability, efficiency and yield of CEA operations.” 

In this context, sustainability means the ability to produce food in a manner that consumes very few natural resources and produces lots of yield for the lowest environmental impact, Boz said.  

Boz credits the majority of the research on the paper to two agricultural and biological engineering doctoral students – Donald Coon and Lauren Lindow.  

Now that he’s participated in this research project, Coon has long-term suggestions for operators of indoor farms.  

“Engage all three dimensions of sustainability – environmental, economic and social,” he said. “Produce a profitable product, with minimal adverse impact and listen and respond to what the consumers are looking for. Focusing on just one of those at a time is inefficient and risky.” 

This piece was originally published at https://blogs.ifas.ufl.edu/news/2024/04/18/uf-ifas-researchers-address-issues-facing-indoor-farms/.

Sign up for The Invading Sea newsletter by visiting here. If you are interested in submitting an opinion piece to The Invading Sea, email Editor Nathan Crabbe at ncrabbe@fau.edu. 

Tags: agriculturecontrolled-environmental agriculture (CEA)energy useindoor farmsland useUF/IFAS
Previous Post

Remote sensing technique captures details of Hurricane Ian’s aftermath

Next Post

Energy-sucking cryptocurrencies good for criminals, bad for consumers

Next Post
A visual representation of a Bitcoin and other digital cryptocurrencies (iStock image)

Energy-sucking cryptocurrencies good for criminals, bad for consumers

Twitter Facebook Instagram Youtube

About this website

The Invading Sea is a nonpartisan source for news, commentary and educational content about climate change and other environmental issues affecting Florida. The site is managed by Florida Atlantic University’s Center for Environmental Studies in the Charles E. Schmidt College of Science.

 

 

Sign up for The Invading Sea newsletter

Sign up to receive the latest climate change news and commentary in your email inbox by visiting here.

Donate to The Invading Sea

We are seeking continuing support for the website and its staff. Click here to learn more and donate.

Calendar of past posts

May 2024
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr   Jun »

© 2022 The Invading Sea

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Multimedia
  • Public opinion
  • About

© 2022 The Invading Sea

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In